Even so, it might be worth some experimentation with the operating point in actual use. IMDs of-30dB would not be acceptable in a commercial terrestrial application.
Mike
Even so, it might be worth some experimentation with the operating point in actual use. IMDs of-30dB would not be acceptable in a commercial terrestrial application.
Mike
This was a joke Dear Remco
I was on the satellite, but my signal is too faint, I'm waiting for my parcel with my EDUP booster.
I think I would hear you, if you came on.
Mike
Hi Johannes
Unfortunately these sort of people do tremendous reputational harm to the hobby. Usually when someone takes a stance like you describe above it is due to their lacking technical abilities or resources to fix the problem. They have possibly spent a lot of money and are in self-denial that all is not right. They often reject criticism, especially where they know deep down that it's true. There is little we can do about such attitudes other than offer to help them fix it.
Mike
To be aware, anyone can look at the CEPT documents which are well worth a read if you have an interest in spectrum issues. The current meeting of the CPM is here https://www.cept.org/ecc/group…ting-documents/?flid=8819
The "Temp" documents are working documents within the meeting in progress and are accessible only to members. The rest of the documents are public.
Mike
There is not always a loop, the inflection cusp at the marker point. Don't worry about the loops on a larger span, it looks like your calibration plane is not at the antenna but perhaps some distance away. If I had the inclination and more information I could work out how far.
The real test is does it work? Transmit a known power, do the link budget. Is it in agreement with your measured result?
I think it would help people a lot is AMSAT DL would come clean with the actual measured performance of the transponder and a real sample link budget. If they can't due to an NDA or do not have the technical capability, I will work with some friends to measure it as best we can.
Mike
Absolutely. If operators can not generate a clean signal or even worse do not understand they need to they should not be permitted to transmit. The lowering of technical requirements for a license can not extend to reduced spectral purity. Firstly, as a community we need to let people with poor signal quality know and help them to fix it. Secondly, persistent abusers, the sort that tune up and down while transmitting to find their signal, regardless of what interference they cause, those that use excessive power and those otherwise behave disruptively need to be firmly dealt with through the licensing process.
Mike
What I don't understand is this idea of DX.... The DX are often closer to the satellite that we are. My path to Remco is longer than the path to some exotic station in Africa or India and we are basically working through a transponder so the HF DXCC propagation element is pointless. Contacting like minded people in other places and discussing things is the point and it doesn't matter where they are.
It is about 10.3 dB this morning but I have noticed it falling as low an 9.8dB in the daytime, lower if there are other strong signals.
The beacon is a bit too wide for my liking and reducing it to 1 MS or less would help with the over-crowding we are now seeing on occasion. Some stations like to transmit 1 MS and we can only accommodate two of these with the current beacon. Only one 2 Ms signal is possible and nothing wider. We all had fun with experimenting wider signals when the beacon was off. Perhaps even 500ks but H265 would be a good compromise.
Meanwhile, several of us have been experimenting with lower bandwidths and higher order modulation. 66ks is 33ks are very usable and can be done with low power.
Mike
I have given up on D75F as they are not reliable. I have respun the PCB to be able to use an Abracon LLC / AST3TQ-V-25.000MHZ-28 and other oscillators in the same package. Actually the packages are practically the same... so the old board is probably usable with the new TCXO. I added provision for a VCTCXO for fun.
Mike
My multibox solution - needs a laptop too. One day I will get it more integrated..
[Blocked Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DG8C7nHWAAAUwgP?format=jpg&name=medium]
[Blocked Image: https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/Q14AAOSw~qxavKLc/s-l300.jpg] [Blocked Image: http://www.leobodnar.com/shop/images/GPSclock2.jpg][Blocked Image: https://uhf-satcom.com/storage/blog/patch/rocket_lens.png][Blocked Image: https://d13z1xw8270sfc.cloudfront.net/resize/383483/1560852337515_bias-580x400.png/400/300/0/]
I think you are going to need help. Perhaps remote desktop or bring it along to the convention.
This is a puzzle - I recently bought a new laptop and had no such issues. It has Nvidia graphics though. VLC does render the video so it's something to do with minitioune. It might be best to ask on the vivadatv forum where you downloaded the software.
Meanwhile, can you show is your grf filters? I will find mine on another PC and show later.
Mike
Edit - sorry, I forgot the later version 0.9 doesn't use grf files any more so you won't have those.
This is often caused by the input resolution being too high. For 333 try setting it to something reasonable, e.g 620x360 and move up from there.
But VMIX is here https://www.vmix.com/ and version 22 - what is these version 16? It does not sound like a reputable link...
Thanks guys for the follow up..!
Any ideas what the manual settings would be for the DVB-S box to receive the wide band TV beacon from Es'hail Sat..?
cheers...!
None - it will not work as the Beacon is DVB-S2. Most boxes these days are, if your is then set the transponder frequency appropriately, set 2Ms and search. For this to work the LNB has to have been modified to a lower LO so that the IF falls within its' frequency range. With a standard LNB the beacon will be below the minimum 950MHz tuning range of standard boxes.
G0MJW Mike take a look to PA3CSG page.. there you find what you need for low prices. He will send it usually out the next days.
Hope this helps you..
Thanks - that's similar to the switch I was planning - but I am planning on my own PCB, why would't you when you can get 10 for $10!
I was just thinking of designing a simple sequencer PCB to drive relays and supply voltage to the PA after a small delay. There are many of these available already but either expensive or not quite what I want.
Another issue with the IC9700 not having separate band by band PTT signals I was considering if the External Preamp voltage could be put to use for this. Gated with another signal to ensure the PA is not permanently enabled when the radio is turned off or on another band. I can't think of a solution yet except perhaps pre-amp voltage lost and PTT enabled. Maybe something can be done via CIV.
Mike
That solar method won't work is you live in the North West, or at least only rarely. If you find the elevation calibration is out it may mean the feed is not located at the correct focus. This can happen if the feed is modified to fit 2.4 GHz.
Mike
Hi all, as many new users are appearing and with no Lila its probably worth mentioning the point about excessive power. Some new operators are using 20W PAs at full output with larger dishes.
Here is an example, which I am sure wasn't intentional and it's about gaining experience and new operators coming on to satellites. It wasn't doing any harm with the transponder empty and the operator reduced power once it was pointed out, but initially their signal was well above the beacon. The signal should be at or below the peak level of the CW beacon on a single tone, it should not be at the same level within the full bandwidth on an SSB filter. I appreciate it is very hard for operators not using SDRs to set these levels which is why monitoring on an SDR or on the WebSDR is recommended.
I have finally joined the 21st Century and have a 9700 awaiting collection in a few days time.
How are IC9700 owners driving upconverters?
My upconverter needs 12mW drive and I don't want to damge it. At the moment I have a FT736R running about 5-10W with a 10W attenuator. But the 9700 output power is an order of magnitude higher.
spikes in the first few milliseconds of TX and power output changing accidentally with an unintentional mode or memory change are worring possibiliies.....
Which is one of the reasons I specifically do not use it. I would suggest a 34dB attenuator as it is easy to make with a 50 Ohm 100W load and a BNC T-piece. Use a 1.2k resistor from the centre. Connect the far end to a 51 Ohm resistor to ground and take the output from across the 51 Ohm resistor. If you need less attenuation, reduce the 1200 Ohm series resistor appropriately, e.g. 510 Ohms will give 27 dB, 330 Ohms 23.5 dB. Lower values give a progressively worse match but not so bad as matters.