Posts by PA3FYM

    In addition to pe1chl I can say that when the NB-transponder was open on 16/17 January it was very convenient to precisely point the dish to the transponder(noise) looking at the waterfall. While tweaking I saw the 'overall' effect of the transponder noise MUCH better in the waterfall compared to tuning to a (single) carrier of a beacon (which always exhibits some QSB).

    BG0AUB When you receive 11199.8H beacon (as you presented in your pictures) you are accurate enough for Es'hail-2. 11199.8H beacon is from Es'hail-1 and is approximately in the same orbital slot.


    IK0EQJ zhaofeng is in another part of the world, and I doubt the (MENA) beams of Es'hail-2 (engineering beacons) have coverage in China. So he very certainly sees other things (not) than we here in Europe. E.g. you have good copy of 11205H while are my lattitude since 10 Jan it almost disappeared.

    Thanks Heiner! I have a similar lens from another LNB but that one consists of two parts, sliding in each other. I think this is called a 'Luneberg lens'. Is this the case with your lens too?


    Edit: no it's not a Luneberg lens (just googled on it ; -)

    In December last year (2018) G0MJW, M0EYT and me (PA3FYM) were involved in designing a LHCP-dual band 2.4-10 GHz feed. Inside this 'love triangle' Mike MJW appeared to be the CST modelling hero (per default ; -), Paul EYT the CNC hero and I (modestly) the circular polarisation (CP) feed point guide to let the patch really produce CP. Result seems to be a good performing LHCP patch (for standard offset dishes with f/D = 0.6). Placed in front of a dish it produces RHCP towards the 2.4 GHz RX antenna of Es'hail-2.


    Only issue to be dealt with is the transition of the (circular) wave guide for the right aperture for a f/D = 0.6 dish. One solution is to buy a 'wrong' (cheap!) DRO 'rocket' LNB, remove the dielectric lens ('polyrod') and throw the remainders in the dust bin. Another approach is to make a dielectric lens. My/our first attempt is/are here: https://tinyurl.com/y75htz9c

    No, not connected to GND. Matching is done with a ¼λ transmission line per usual or a contraption like in the picture ; -) I would advise to crop the corners of the copper fane at the center of the connector.


    Zhelix = ca. 120Ω, so ¼λ Ztl = 77.5Ω. Or you can match with a LC network:



    G8HAJ You're welcome!


    However, to check if my memory was right I googled my eyes out. Nothing found. No IARU hits etc.


    Then I phoned some (prominent!) EME-ers and asked them if they could confirm whether the EME-uplink is RHCP. No answer ... (?) However, one person remembered that in the W2IMU EME-newsletters (looong time ago) there was a short article concerning which polarisation to use. With this information I scanned the archives. The result is ... phew ... my memory was right.


    Proof below:



    Edit: I also found the source: IARU R1 VHF Handbook: